What we are thinking about when developing social software for organizations are decoupling devices empowering the employees and the managers to do what they think and see and communicate to serve the needs of the organization, that is the needs of their job with respect to a certain selection of other jobs inside and outside the organization. Yet at the same time social software is a substitute for committees. You can't but link when you use it, even when you always have the choice of what link to pursue and what to leave aside.
This combination of decoupling and embedding is left to the software doing the necessary computing. Member of the organization just go along with their decisions, using distinctions as they think appropriate.
System One hides in the unmarked space of the organization. It is the space that in any case is with all members while they look after what they are doing. It is an unmarked space impossible to represent in its complexity at any one point of the organization since every user is looking as his or her marked space of specific information to take into account without having an idea of the scope of decoupling and embedding going on.
The network organization is a postclassical one in that it draws on the decisions of all members to determine what is indeterminate. And it is an X organization since its very mechanisms of self-organization link marked to unmarked spaces.
Amazingly, the network organization, based on social software, is akin to any kind of general management which consists in getting action via the generalization and mixing of contexts (H.C. White), since with System One you watch it mix while you sort it out.